Patrick Ogle
  • Movies I have seen recently
  • Books Ive Read 2023-24
  • An Explanation
  • Recent Writing Portfolio
  • Paintings & Other Art
  • History and Current Events
  • My Witty Observations (Humor)

October Scary (ok, some really aren't scary) Movies, Tis The SEASON! Part 2

10/13/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
October 26

Watch ? YES...

Horror Express 1972  Eugenio Martin


How this Spanish horror thrilled eluded me for my entire life baffles me.  It has everything a horror movie NEEDS. Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing and, as an extra bonus it has Tele Savalis as a ....Cossack.

It also has a mad monk, brain melting, a prehistoric ape, an alien, Russian royalty, scientific mumbo jumbo, zombies (sort of) and some truly classic lines that I won't spoil the fun by repeating. It is like Murder on the Orient Express but not actually like Murder on the Orient Express. I kept thinking about the TV show, Kolchak, the Night Stalker. If Darren McGavin has shown up in a rumpled suit wearing a straw hat and carrying a 110 camera I would not have been surprised.

It is a little bloodier than episodes of that tv show to be sure.

This Spanish film moves at a brisk pace, has a number of breakdowns in basic logic but really who cares about that? Well, I care. I did keep thinking--"Why do the soldiers on the train have rifles with fixed bayonets?" That REALLY isn't a terribly effective weapon in a confined space.  BUT, as usual, I digress.  They keep this film moving. It isn't like many films of the era that build up to action with an hour of set up. This gets moving and keeps moving and is under 90 minutes.

It is fun, it works and it is professionally put together and, frankly, is a classic film of the era--although it seems like it is from a slightly earlier time when I think on it.

Picture
October 23, 2025

Watch? YES

Black Sunday (aka The Mask of Satan) 1960 Mario Bava  


I was honestly getting burned out with my plan of taking breaks to watch horror movies because most of the films I watched were….ok. Not terrible (although some were terrible) but just ok. Sometimes I find “ok” to be more tedious than AWFUL. At least you can roll your eyes at awful.

Shivers inspired me to look for more Barbara Steele movies and I came up with Black Sunday. No, terrorists do NOT attack the Orange Bowl. This is a stylish, amazingly well shot, Italian horror film. Steele gets double duty and I honestly wish she had more screen time. It is a moody, dark film about vengeance from beyond the grave. The international cast are all solid actors (never a given in horror or scifi films). 

I would watch this again just to see the cinematography. Plus it is creepy. 


Picture
October 21, 2025
Watch? Maybe

Shivers 1975 David Cronenberg

I was trying to watch movies I hadn’t seen but I have a sneaking suspicion that I did see this. I don’t really remember it but the whole “parasite infecting people” was pretty familiar. This is kind of a throw-away “everyone’s getting infected” movie. Could be vampires, body snatchers…whatever.

It is short. It moves along relatively fast but there just isn’t much here. Aside from some creepy insinuations.  It could be that I’ve watched two dozen horror films and the vast majority have been middling. There is THAT.

Barbara Steele has a small role in this movie. She was also in Black Sunday, 8 ½, Pit and the Pendulum and .


Picture
 October 20

Watch? No

Nefarious 2023 Cary Solomon and Chuck Konzelman

Did you wake up today thinking "I want to see a right wing evangelical horror movie about possession"? Well then YOU are in luck because Nefarious is out there waiting for you. This is what happens when you just randomly watch something.

There is a cameo by...Glenn Beck...in this movie. Do you need to hear more?

A possessed inmate about to be executed gives a lengthy diatribe about abortion. It also seems to insinuate that executing the mentally ill is ok. Of course, most horror has a hint of the religious. Vampires fear crosses. Most are morality tales of a sort. The real surprise about this is that it isn't BAD. It is just tired. The film is about a condemned inmate who may be possessed or insane and a psychologist comes in to decide which it is. Sean Patrick Flanery turns in a solid performance as the inmate. Flanery was  in Boondocks Saints and one of the Saw movies. All the acting is fine. It has just been done to death--every police procedural has an episode like this --with the supernatural element downplayed.

Picture
October 19, 2025

Watch? Yes

Countess Dracula 1971 Peter Sasdy

SO, another Hammer Horror film but no Peter Cushing OR Christopher Lee! Ingrid Pitt is on board and makes the lead character somehow vaguely sympathetic (despite all the murdering). Nigel Green stands in for Lee. He was tall, handsome and very very English, often playing soldiers with stiff upper lips in films like Zulu and Ipcress File.

Like many of the Hammer films it is concisely and professionally done with actors who know what they are there for (to look good and be a little scary). One of the things that often sets these films apart from horror of the era is that the actors are actually good. It reminds me of soap opera actors and how they have to sell the most preposterous plots and actions as real. Leslie-Anne Down, who appears in a small role, wound up in The Bold and the Beautiful.

This film has nothing to do with Dracula really. It is more akin to the story of Elizabeth Bathory. I suppose Countess Dracula was a better title than "Countess Bathory"? As usual they keep the plot simple. It all works, moves along well and while it may have been moderately scary to a kid in 1971? I didn’t have nightmares.

Picture
October 19, 2025

Watch? Maybe

Gretel And Hansel 2020  Osgood Perkins

See what they did there? Gretel comes first! Pretty innovative. I wish the film had been as innovative. It wastes a couple good performances, one being from Alice Krige who is a master at being creepy and threatening. The other is from Sophia Lillis of the new It movies and Asteroid City. She was also really good in the tv show I Am Not OK With This which, I regret, didn’t get a season 2. Samuel Leakey also does a good job as Hansel. He is a LITTLE annoying, like a little brother but he isn’t SO annoying you start wishing for him to get eaten. The film doesn’t meander and is concise but maybe TOO concise.

Part of the problem here is the limitation of the story. It is a morality tale and a simple one. This version abandons the original moral to the story for a new one and it basically works. I could have used a little more background and some more action. When you have a “bad” character maybe be a little more explicit and showing WHY they are bad. It is a brief film so you won’t get bored but it wouldn’t have suffered from another 10 or 15 minutes of action.


Picture
October 17 2025

Watch? Maybe 


The Dunwich Horror 1970 Daniel Haller

There is an inherent problem with bringing HP Lovecraft stories to the big screen. He often describes the horror before us on the page “inexplicable” and “so horrifying it cannot be described”....stuff like that. How do you show THAT? There is also the issue of his racism but that isn’t obvious in EVERY story, only many of them. This one is loosely based on a The Dunwich Horror, very loosely, and it uses reaction shots of people being really HORRIFIED to get the scariness across.

The most interesting thing about this movie is the casting. Sandra Dee in a horror movie in 1970? I mean this could have been a new career for her (but it wasn’t). Dean Stockwell (who could curiously be cast in a later remake based on the same story) is also featured. He gives a strange performance–as a strange character. Who else shows up? Ed Begley. NO, not that Ed Begley, his dad, an Oscar winning actor who passed away less than a year after this film’s release. AND, if that weren’t enough, pre-Godfather Talia Shire, shows up in a cameo. Curiously with all these memorable actors, the film isn’t particularly memorable. It has some style and the basic story is simple enough to manage but, and I rarely write or think this, it could have been a LITTLE longer.

I was never bored but I wanted a little more? If that makes sense.

Picture
October 14, 2025

Burnt Offerings 1976 Dan Curtis

Watch? No

Karen Black, Oliver Reed and Bette Davis. Has to be good right? No it does not. All the actors, including the very young Lee Montgomery and Burgess Meredith (who can always be creepy when he wants to be) give it their all. This is especially true of Davis but it just never clicks. 

It is also interesting that Davis and Reed were in the same movie. I wondered how THAT went. 

Davis afterwards referred to Reed as “the most loathsome human being I have ever had the misfortune to meet.” or something like that. It is interesting because these two actors had reputations for being difficult and consummate professionals at the same time.

The plot of this is just the same old haunted house thing with the weirdos who live there. It never creates much atmosphere nor is it ever really suspenseful. The plot is basically nonexistent.

Picture
October 14, 2025

Saint Maud 2019 Rose Glass

Watch? Yes

Is this a horror film? Depends on how YOU interpret it. I am pretty sure I know how you are supposed to?  Or do I? That is a big plus to me in a movie when you have to stop and think about what you watched.

When I ask, is this a horror film? One response that pops into my head is “Well, it is certainly HORRIFYING on a number of levels.” I winced more than once. The acting here is head and shoulders above most horror films. The plot revolves around a nurse who comes to take care of a new patient while she is having some….life issues.

It keeps you engaged throughout. Well done.


Picture
October 13, 2025

Bride of Frankenstein 1935 James Whale

Watch? No


This  is regarded as a horror classic. To me it just seemed like a pointless rehash of Frankenstein. I haven’t read Frankenstein for years but I believe this is based loosely on something that is actually IN the book but I'm not sure. I don’t care enough to look it up. There is some appalling acting and some competent acting in this but really there is nothing to it. James Whale, by the by, made some really good movies--horror and otherwise.

Hell Henry Frankenstein says “She’s ALIVE” in the same way as he did in the original. Of course in this movie it makes no sense since he is being forced to make the new monster. Also, the “Bride” is in it for about 10 minutes. 

What the hell is that idiotic beginning with Lord friggin Byron?

Just because something is old doesn’t mean it is good.

0 Comments

October Scary (ok, some really aren't scary) Movies, Tis The SEASON! Part 1

10/1/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
I don't really want to write "reviews" of these movies just impressions without giving anything away. I am making an effort to watch movies I've never seen, and I've seen a lot of horror movies....

October 1, 2025

Watch? Yes

The Brood (1979) David Cronenberg



I thought I'd seen The Brood but I hadn't. I suppose there are innumerable movies called "The...SOMETHING" out there. The first impression is that...Damn, Oliver Reed was 41 or so when this movie came out. Lord he looks 15 years older but I suppose he lived in dog years. My next, immediate post-watch impression was "This seems ALMOST normal...for Cronenberg". The Brood isn't really...normal though, just for Cronenberg. He apparently wrote this after an ugly custody battle to which I say...DAMN.

It is a well paced, low key horror film that, at the half way point I had no idea what was going on. I love that in a horror movie so long as I still WANT to know what is going on. That is not always a given. It had a similar feel to films from earlier in the 70s like The Sentinel or even Don't Look Now. It doesn't try to explain too much but it explains all it needs to. That is always death for a horror movie--too much back story, too much explanation. They usually do it when they've gotten to a third or fourth sequel

Samantha Eggar (if you haven't seen The Collector watch it...) manages to be vulnerable, sympathetic and creepy in pretty much every scene she is in. Of course, Reed is always good, even in bad movies and this is a pretty good one.  Its a well-paced, creepy horror film. Maybe not the director's best but still in the upper tier.


Picture
October 1, 2025

Watch? Yes

The Vampire Lovers (1970) Roy Ward Baker

The  Vampire Lovers is a “Hammer Horror” film. You can tell because Peter Cushing is in it (if he wasn’t I think they were required by Parliament to call Christopher Lee). Like most Hammer films it is long on style and short on coherence. Not that it is INCOHERENT but there are some completely inexplicable “characters” in the film and some that have a basic task. For instance “The Countess” exists as a character to deliver another character to where they NEED to be to make the film move forward. There is another character that never speaks but appears at various points leering at the action like a peeping tom. None of this takes up much time. Probably only a bit more than five or ten minutes of the film. This does serve a purpose and keeps the film from bogging down. Except for the leering character, he does nothing and seems like maybe more with him wound up on the cutting room floor.

Making the film move along briskly is important; there are heads to be chopped, necks to be bitten and nude frolicking that all need to happen. 

It was interesting to me that “The Countess” is played by Dawn Adams who was also in Charles Chaplin’s second to last film A King in New York (among many other films). Likewise Marcilla, the vampire, is played by Polish actress, Ingrid Pitt (not her original name). Pitt plays a vampire in at least three Hammer films including Countess Dracula. Madeline Smith was in Live and Let Die, a film where she is required to…be beautiful. 

The choice to use voice over and monologue to explain things rather than SHOW us is not my favorite device. That isn’t really a criticism. I just generally don’t love screen crawls and voice overs in lieu of film making. But here?  If they didn’t explain what was going on, it might be a little hard to figure out. If they made it more complex and left it to the audience to discern what was going on it would be a Japanese horror film and not a British film from the 70s.  

All in all a fun 70s vampire film. It never drags. Some Hammer films can be a little ponderous. Here they tie most of it together (excepting the weird leering guy who I think had fangs).



Picture
  • October 2, 2025
Watch? Yes

Lake Mungo (2008) Joel Anderson

Lake Mungo, directed by Joel Anderson, is a film that gets the “documentary” style so right that I had to PAUSE the film because I thought; “Wait, IS this a documentary.” For the first five or ten minutes you might really think that this is actually a documentary and it stays true in style throughout.

It is impossible to watch this without thinking of the Paranormal Activity films which, when they try to do the documentary or “found footage” thing are far less convincing than this film is at making it seem real (not a knock on those films, they are not trying to be cinema verite like this is). I was apprehensive as this began but it drew me in and kept me interested. It certainly goes in unexpected directions and while there were a couple of times as I watched that I thought “Hey, wait, that isn’t realistic” that is more due to how real most of this seems. Most horror films you watch without thinking about how realistic the vampire is or whether the bogeyman could really withstand being shot 5 times with a .357.

Is it scary? Here and there. It is more creepy than scary and when it starts to get really creepy they, for some reason, pull out of that and sort of move in another direction. Again, one of the saving graces here is that it doesn’t over explain.

The director also was involved in the film Late Night With The Devil (continuity department) and wrote and directed a short I saw years ago called  The Rotting Woman. This appears to be his only feature directorial effort.

It is a film worth a watch if you aren’t looking to be scared silly or jump out of your seat.

Picture
October 2, 2025

Watch? HELL No

The Naked Witch (1964) Claude Alexander and Larry Buchanan


The opening is a crawl with a voice over (I guess for those of us who cannot read). In fact most of the movie is made up of voice over (by two narrators and a character). I had this saved to watch on a streaming service for a year or more and I basically watched it because it was only an hour long.

The voice over goes on for…a long time. Eight and a half minutes. The initial voice over is a“history” of witchcraft as if witchcraft was real. There is much cheesy organ music which is distracting, or would be if there was anything to be distracted from.

It looks like it was shot on a home super 8 camera. I suspect the budget was about $100. The dialog is idiotic. No one in it can even sort of act. Most local tv junk yards have better actors in their commercials. OH, and the camera work is also appalling.  

I guess if you are one of those who talks about a love of “dive bars” and “kitsch” and think everything is ironic you might  like this. Also? You might like it if you are an idiot.

Note this movie had TWO directors. God only knows why. You may recognize Buchanan. He also directed It's Alive!, which is a piece of shit too but it makes this look like The Devil's Backbone, Village of the Damned or Let the Right One In (Swedish or American) rolled together.

Picture
October 3, 2025

Watch? Yes

Butter on the Latch 2013 Josephine Decker


OK so this probably isn’t horror and it really isn’t “Halloween Horror” but a certain streaming service had it listed as horror. Given their “plot description” this isn’t surprising. It is creepy though so there is that.

What this film is, however, is startlingly unique and keenly intelligent. It is innovative. Parts of it are shot and put together like you picked up a stranger's cell phone and watched the videos after a particularly bad night. This is not an insult or back handed compliment. This movie is brilliantly shot, written and edited. I may watch it again after my OCD Halloween movie thing is done.

Also? I am never , for a variety of reasons, going to a Balkan Cultural Festival out in the woods.

The actors Sarah Small, Isolde Chae-Lawrence and Charlie Hewson are all first rate and believable. Smalls (click on the IMDB link) seems to be able to do anything. She may also be an astronaut by no w.Chae-Lawrence has four credits for acting in the past decade but I just put Sisters of the Plague on my list. 



Picture
October 3, 2025

Watch? No

Censor 2021  Prano Baily-Bond


OK so just a note for filmmakers. You cannot make a good movie without a well thought out script. Also? Atmosphere and ominous music are not a viable substitute for a story. And this filmmaker, from all the press, is REALLY GOOD at this..although how the press saying this know after 2 shorts and a middling feature like this I do not know. She’s a young Welsh director and I wanted to like this movie but, alas, I did not. Didn’t hate it either.

It starts out ok and there is a kernel of a good idea here. I was thinking of the excellent “Masters of Horror” episode, Cigarette Burns (John Carpenter). But that episode DELIVERS. This doesn’t. Add to that possibly the dumbest ending in the history of horror movies and this was mostly just a bore. It never delivers anything except the desire to turn it off. I will give it that I thought I figured out what the end was going to be–and I was wrong. So bonus credits there.

The actors do as good a job as they can? It's professional and, as noted, has atmosphere, but just not much going on. How is the British Film Institute involved in this production? Well thought of young director?. NOW, I have to go watch her shorts. They have to be good right?

October 3, 2025


Picture
October 4, 2025

Watch? Maybe

Wolfman 2025 Leigh Whannell 

I was expecting this to be bad. It isn’t. As werewolf movies go it was actually pretty good. This is because most werewolf movies suck. Sure there is Dog Soldiers. There are also the “Ginger Snaps” movies. The first and third in that series are good. And yes, American Werewolf in London is worth a watch but compared to vampires, zombies and slashers? Werewolves lag.

And no, Wolfen is not a werewolf movie.

I felt like this movie had an odd problem. It isn’t too long in and of itself but it has a lot of shots that seem longer than they need to be-people reacting to things or waiting for something to jump out at them. Sure, you need to build suspense but for this I think faster would have been better.

Also, it takes like 7 years for someone to be declared dead when they disappear. If you watch it you will know why I bring this up. The acting is good. Christopher Abbott, Julia Garner (doing double scary movie duty this year with Weapons) and Matilda Firth all do a pretty good job selling this. There are some really cool bits about how the werewolf sees people and the world (and how people perceive the werewolf). I wish there was more of that frankly. They could have used the scenery better too actually. But it's worth watching.

Picture
October 5, 2025

Watch? Yes

Eyes WIthout A Face 1960 Georges Franju


Odd I’d never seen this and it is fabulous. It is the quintessential and seminal mad doctor horror film. Damn near everything in this film is perfect. It is beautifully shot and just…perfect.

Well, except for one thing. The soundtrack for parts of it does the unthinkable. It is noticeable in a really bad way. It is the music from Curb Your Enthusiasm (I'm not kidding, it really is) in parts and in other parts it is less inappropriate but it is ridiculously overdone (especially early in the film). It is by Maurice Jarre whose work is usually excellent. He did a ton of David Lean movies. Here? Baffling. 

But the movie is top notch.

Pierre Brasseur, who you may recognize from Children of Paradise and a slew of other films, had the role of the doctor. Edith Scob, who had a career spanning decades and including The Brotherhood of the Wolf, plays his daughter.  The third principal character was played by Alida Valli--Dario Argento fans will recognize her from Susperia.



Picture
October 7, 2025

Watch? Maybe

Dark Angel - The Ascent 1994
Linda Hassani

I skipped watching a movie on October 6 and on October 7 I wanted something dumb and this hit that particular nail on the head. BUT I have to add here dumb isn’t a bad thing….it is dumb and sort of fun.

The scenes in hell in this movie look like a Dante’s Inferno BDSM party (people would pay good money to attend). It also takes an interesting philosophical stance, namely that demons are part of the supernatural justice system and servants of god. This movie is pure cheese and, at first, I thought the acting was bad but then I thought; is that true? Or is the acting exactly what it was meant to be and needed to be for this goofy, peculiar movie about a demon who comes to earth and cleans up a crooked town. This isn’t The Shining but if you go in knowing what it is? They wisely keep it to 84 minutes. 

The main actors in this are Daniel Markel, well known to fans of As the World Turns and model/actress Angela Featherstone who has been in a lot of movies (Con Air, The Wedding Singer, Soul Survivors).

Picture
October 8, 2025

Watch? Yes

House 1977  Nobuhiko Obayashi

This is a peculiar movie. It is in a style that might remind of late 60s US television and movies trying hard to be “trippy.” It mixes live action with animation and isn’t scary at all. But it makes up for that with weird. It IS a horror movie. There is more style than actual plot here but it is worth watching even if it is dated. The comedic elements in this, I will warn, are not funny at all. Maybe in Japan? Humor is dependent on culture. It could also just be that it is dated. 

All the characters have nicknames related to a stereotype. Not much plot or character development (what do you need to KNOW….it is ALL in the nicknames!). It is really interesting to look at though and that makes it worthwhile.


Picture
October 9, 2025

Watch? Yes

Winchester 2018 The Spierig Brothers


Winchester is a reasonably well put together ghost story. It isn’t without faults but I am pretty sure you will jump more than once while watching it. Helen Mirren is in it and while every movie she is in isn’t great? You can always count on HER to give it her all. This is a fairly restrained role and she could probably pull it off in her sleep. Also on hand is Jason Clarke who has been in a slew of movies from Dawn of the Planet of the Apes to Mudbound to Zero Dark Thirty. He was also in the Terrence Malick movie, Knight of Cups. If I recall, that was unscripted. Clarke has the most memorable role even if they wisely don’t delve too deep and bog the film down.

The Spierig Brothers also did the film Jigsaw from the Saw series which was decent too.

Picture
October 10, 2025

Watch? Yes

The Shout 1978 Jerzy Skolimowski 

The starring cast here includes Alan Bates, Susannah York and John Hurt. There are appearances by a young looking Tim Curry and a quite thin Jim Broadbent (who, at one point, runs about in an athletic supporter). I am fairly certain I don’t need to discuss the careers of the main cast!

This is one of those odd little movies where, at first, you don’t really GET the “horror” aspect of it.  Then you do. It is quite subtle. It doesn’t try to explain a damned thing and everyone here has such command and presence that it just works. It is, on the surface, a simple film. It is funny I saw a number of middling reviews of this, no doubt from folks who think Friday the 13th is the pinnacle of horror (I hate those movies myself, not my thing). When I say it doesn’t explain this doesn’t mean it isn’t coherent or cohesive because it is. The slow build up is something of a lost art in horror films I suppose.

One of the best things I can say about this is that I cannot think of anything off the top of my head to compare it to. That and the fact there is a lot below the surface here, tons of subtext you can choose to unpack–or not.

Picture
October 10, 2025

Watch? Yes

Fiend Without A Face 1958  Arthur Crabtree

I watched this movie right after the subtle, strange and cohesive film, The Shout. Quite a contrast. This film is not subtle at all. It is very much a typical B 1950s Sci-Fi film. Hard to say this film is completely incoherent but let’s start with the title. The ‘fiend’ here is…invisible. This REALLY cuts down on the special effects cost! Of course they eventually become visible and, for the time, were probably pretty high tech. 

This is NOT a bad movie when you consider what it is. It is in the upper tier of movies like this from the era. They are all, even for the time period, full of scientific gobbeldygook but this movie doesn’t dwell on this part of it.  It also never gets all “red scary” or jingoistic and that is a plus. I did feel like one character seemed to get over the death of a sibling REALLY fast but that is a niggling complaint.

The film is British, set in Canada and features a few American actors–and several inexpertly trying to cover up their British Isles accents (some don’t even try but hey, there are Scots in Canada). The film was apparently brought up in Parliament for being too gory. Of course the Brits freaked out and thought the early Dr. Who tv shows were “too scary.” It might have seemed scary to 10 year olds in 1958? But it is a fun old monster movie with a little nuclear paranoia dusted on for good measure.

0 Comments

    Movies

    I don't think of these as "reviews." they may seem like it sometime but they are more just...impressions.

    Categories

    All
    2014 Best Picture Nominee
    Action
    American
    Animated
    Belgian
    British
    Chile
    China
    Comedy
    Documentary
    Drama
    Egypt
    French
    German
    Horror
    Independent
    Indonesian
    Iranian
    Irish
    Italy
    Lebanese
    Science Fiction

    Picture

    Archives

    October 2025
    February 2020
    October 2017
    October 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010

    RSS Feed